Lance Armstrong won the Tour de France a record seven consecutive times between 1999 and 2005--one of the most notable achievements in modern sport. As a result, Mr. Armstrong rightfully received recognition, achieved personal celebrity, and acquired considerable wealth (estimated personal net worth of over $100million). The wealth came primarily from corporate sponsorships and personal product endorsements, which are both forms of sales. Unfortunately, Mr. Armstrong was recently disqualified from the majority of his impressive cycling results for using illicit performance-enhancing drugs. He was also banned from most professional sport for life. Mr. Armstrong did not appeal the decision to the Court of Arbitration for Sport, and until recently he has repeatedly denied ever doping. It would appear that a confession of sorts will be forthcoming by Mr. Armstrong through an interview with Oprah Winfrey.
I bring the controversy surrounding Lance Armstrong forward in this forum not because I wish to cast stones at Mr. Armstrong, but because the issue goes to the heart of truthfulness and integrity in our work. David Miller at Princeton University recently wrote a thoughtful piece on this at his faith and work blog http://faithandworkblog.com/2012/12/04/which-lance-do-we-embrace/. This story unfolds at a time when society is driven primarily by economic forces and considerations (as opposed to moral and ethical). In such a society, the temptation to cheat (e.g., use performance enhancing drugs to win athletic competitions), lie (e.g., deny the use of those drugs in winning the competitions), and steal (e.g., sell personal endorsements and sponsorships based on celebrity gained from winning competitions while using drugs) is extraordinarily strong. Many of us face similar temptations in our own lives and work. Reports in the media often demonstrate that these temptations can be strong, and the will can be weak. During these times it may be helpful to emulate figures like the Buddha and Jesus, both of whom were tempted after long periods of deprivation. While these sages were up to the task, history reveals that individuals often are not. In those cases, it may be helpful to quickly admit where we go astray (as it appears Mr. Armstrong is about to do), ask for forgiveness, and strive for redemption.
I recently listened to Shirzad Chamine's best-selling book: http://positiveintelligence.com/.
I can recommend this book without reservation. In it, Chamine identifies ten behavioral patterns or ways of thinking and acting that are developed early in life and persist into adulthood for many individuals. He calls these patterns saboteurs, and names them as follows: 1) Judge, 2) Stickler, 3) Avoider, 4) Hyper-Vigilant, 5) Restless, 6) Hyper-Achiever, 7) Victim, 8) Pleaser, 9) Controller, 10) Hyper-Rational. He claims that these patterns, while helpful for survival in early development, hinder (or sabotage) us later in life. Charmine goes on to identify five "sage" powers, or behaviors/exercises that can be utilized to weaken the saboteurs which he calls: 1) Activate, 2) Navigate, 3) Explore, 4) Innovate, 5) Empathize.
I found the description of the saboteurs most compelling. It has helped me to recognize some these qualities in myself, and in others with whom I interact. The simple act of noticing and recognizing a pattern is enough to weaken it. The book could have stood on its own with just that. Charmine's description of the sage powers took longer to resonate with me. The perspective is that any challenge or problem is a blessing/gift/opportunity, or could be turned into one. It has taken me quite a while to appreciate this perspective, especially with the most difficult challenges in life. Chamine describes “five powers” of the sage that can be activated to navigate challenges as follows: 1) Explore with curiosity and open mind, 2) Empathize with self or others, while bringing compassion and understanding to any situation, 3) Innovate to create new perspectives, 4) Navigate to a path that is supportive of a one's own deeper sense of purpose and peace, 5) Activate toward action and decision without interference or influence of the saboteurs.
